Legal narrative in court judgments: Hegemonic construction of reality

Author1

Le Cheng

Affiliation

City University of Hong Kong

Author2

King Kui Sin

Affiliation

City University of Hong Kong

Author3

Jian Li

Affiliation

City University of Hong Kong

Abstract

Narrative has been studied in various disciplines, which contributes to the analysis of legal narratives. The paper makes an attempt to understand legal narrative mainly from socio-linguistic and cognitive-linguistic perspectives and argues the constructive nature in legal narratives, and establishes hegemony in legal narratives as convention. Based on case study, the paper contends that spatial manipulation and voice manipulation are employed by court as strategies to create legal hegemony in narratives, and unraveling such strategies helps to deconstruct legal hegemony, which, if employed by a higher court, turns to be another turn of narrative hegemony.

Keywords

legal narrative; court judgment; legal hegemony; reality construction

Publication Date

December 20, 2007

Issue

Volume 1, Issue 2

Citation information

Cheng, Le, King Kui Sin, and Jian Li. 2007. “Legal narrative in court judgments: Hegemonic construction of reality.” Language. Text. Society 1 (2): e59-e70. https://ltsj.online/2007-01-2-cheng-sin-li. (Journal title at the time of publication: SamaraAltLinguo E-Journal.)

BibTeX

@Article{Cheng2007,
author = {Cheng, Le and Sin, King Kui and Li, Jian},
title = {{Legal narrative in court judgments: Hegemonic construction of reality}},
journal = {Language. Text. Society},
year = {2007},
volume = {1},
number = {2},
pages = {59–70},
url = {https://ltsj.online/2007-01-2-cheng-sin-li/},
}

References

Barrett, Michèle. 1986. Women’s oppression today: problems in Marxist feminist analysis. London: Verso Ed.

Bell, Susan E. 1988. “Becoming a Political Woman: The Reconstruction and Interpretation of Experience Through Stories.” In Gender and Discourse: The Power of Talk, edited by A. D. Todd and S. Fisher, 97-123. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Bell, Susan E. 1999. “Narratives and Lives: Women’s Health Politics and the Diagnosis of Cancer for DES Daughters.” Narrative Inquiry 9 (2): 347-389. https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.9.2.08bel.

Bell, Susan E. 2000. “Experiencing Illness in/and Narrative.” In Handbook of Medical Sociology, edited by Chloe E. Bird, Peter Conrad, Allen M. Fremont, 5th edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Berger, John. 1972. “The Changing View of Man in the Portrait.” In Selected Essays and Articles: The Look of Things, by John Berger, edited by Nikos Stangos, 35-41. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. In Other Words: Essays towards a Reflexive Sociology. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.

Bruner, Jerome S. 1986. Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Bruner, Jerome S. 1990. Acts of meaning. The Jerusalem-Harvard lectures. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Comaroff, Jean, and John Lionel Comaroff. 1991. Of Revelation and Revolution: Christianity, Colonialism, and Consciousness in South Africa. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Cronon, William. 1992. “A Place for Stories: Nature, History, and Narrative.” The Journal of American History 78 (4): 1347. https://doi.org/10.2307/2079346.

Delgado, Richard. 1989. “Storytelling for Oppositionists and Others: A Plea for Narrative.” Michigan Law Review 87 (8): 2411. https://doi.org/10.2307/1289308.

Ewick, Patricia, and Susan S. Silbey. 1998. The common place of law: stories from everyday life. Language and legal discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Ewick, Patricia, and Susan Silbey. 2003. “Narrating Social Structure: Stories of Resistance to Legal Authority.” American Journal of Sociology 108 (6): 1328–1372. https://doi.org/10.1086/378035.

Fisher, Walter R. 1984. “Narration as a Human Communication Paradigm: The Case of Public Moral Argument.” Communication Monographs 51 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758409390180.

Gordon, Robert W. 1987. “Unfreezing Legal Reality: Critical Approaches to Law.” Florida State University Law Review 15 (2): 195-220. http://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr/vol15/iss2/1.

Kelman, Mark. 1981. “Interpretive Construction in the Substantive Criminal Law.” Stanford Law Review 33 (4): 591-673. https://doi.org/10.2307/1228535.

Labov, William. 1972. ‘‘The Transformation of Experience in Narrative Syntax.’’ In Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular, by William Labov, 354-396. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Labov, William. 1981. “Speech Actions and Reactions in Personal Narrative.” In Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk, edited by Deborah Tannen & James E. Alatis, 219-247. Washington, D.C: Georgetown University Press.

Labov, William. 1997. “Some Further Steps in Narrative Analysis.” Journal of Narrative and Life History 7 (1–4): 395–415. https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.7.49som.

Linde, Charlotte. 1993. Life stories: the creation of coherence. Oxford Studies in Sociolinguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.

Massaro, Toni M. 1989. “Empathy, Legal Storytelling, and the Rule of Law: New Words, Old Wounds?” Michigan Law Review 87 (8): 2099. https://doi.org/10.2307/1289301.

McKenzie, Sandra C. 1992. “Storytelling: A Different Voice for Legal Scholarship.” University of Kansas Law Review 41: 251.

Peller, Gary. 1985. “The Metaphysics of American Law.” California Law Review 73 (4): 1151-1154. https://doi.org/10.2307/3480430.

Ricoeur, Paul. 1981. “Narrative Time.” In On Narrative, edited by William John Thomas Mitchell. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Sherwin, Richard K. 1988. “A Matter of Voice and Plot: Belief and Suspicion in Legal Storytelling.” Michigan Law Review 87 (3): 543. https://doi.org/10.2307/1289087.

White, Hayden. 1981. “The Value of Narrativity in the Representation of Reality.” In On Narrative, edited by William John Thomas Mitchell. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.