Vocabulary structure in primary school textbooks in Tamil

Author

L. R. Prem Kumar

Affiliation

LDC-IL Department, Central Institute of Indian Languages, Mysore, India

Abstract

The word structure is normally based on the number of letters in a word in the Tamil textbooks and accordingly single letter words to multiple letter words are graded. But this study fully concentrates on the syllabic structure of the word which has resulted in different opinions about the complex or compound structure of words. Based on the syllabic structure of words it is easy to measure the complexity of words and accordingly the selection of words for each standard may be done which on the other hand makes the textbooks easy for the learners. It will facilitate in learning of vocabulary. The syllabic structures are analyzed standard wise and represented by tables for easy understanding of the system of analysis. Moreover, the syllables are analyzed keeping in view the beginning of a word with a consonant or a vowel. This study also proves that there is a link between the difficulty level of learning and the number of syllables as well as the vowel or consonant beginning words. A comparative statement of the syllabic structure in each standard is also given. This paper investigates the frequency of vocabulary patterns used at the primary school level. The vocabulary patterns are dealt with in phonology on the basis of their syllabic and canonical forms. The structure of vocabulary can be classified into the following three types: simple, complex and compound based on their structure. And also this paper gives some ideas of vocabulary analysis for textbooks evaluation.

Keywords

vocabulary; structure; textbook; evaluation; Tamil Corpus; primary school

Publication Date

April 1, 2015

Issue

Volume 5, Issue 1

Citation information

Prem Kumar, L. R. 2015. “Vocabulary structure in primary school textbooks in Tamil.” Language. Text. Society 5 (1): e50-e67. https://ltsj.online/2015-05-1-premkumar. (Journal title at the time of publication: SamaraAltLinguo E-Journal.)

BibTeX

@Article{PremKumar2015,
author = {Prem Kumar, L. R.},
title = {{Vocabulary structure in primary school textbooks in Tamil}},
journal = {Language. Text. Society},
year = {2015},
volume = {5},
number = {1},
pages = {50–67},
url = {https://ltsj.online/2015-05-1-premkumar/},
}

References

Anglin, Jeremy M., George A. Miller, and Pamela C. Wakefield. 1993. “Vocabulary Development: A Morphological Analysis.” Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 58 (10): i. https://doi.org/10.2307/1166112.

Awad, Ahmed. 2008. “Analyzing ‘English for Palestine-10’ for Teaching English for the Tenth Graders in Public Schools in Palestine in Terms of the Characteristics of a good English Textbook.” Journal of Al-Quds Open University for Research and Studies 13: 4-14.

Deacon, S. Hélène, and John R. Kirby. 2004. “Morphological Awareness: Just ‘More Phonological’? The Roles of Morphological and Phonological Awareness in Reading Development.” Applied Psycholinguistics 25 (2): 223–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716404001110.

DK Illustrated Oxford Dictionary, Rev. ed. 2003. London; New York: Oxford; New York: Dorling Kindersley; Oxford University Press.

Laufer, Batia, and Paul Nation. 1999. “A Vocabulary-Size Test of Controlled Productive Ability.” Language Testing 16 (1): 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229901600103.

Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. 2009. 5th Edition. Pearson Education Limited.

Miller, Tom. 2005. Functional Approaches to Written Text. Washington, D.C.: Office of English Language Programs, United States Department of State.

Pillai, Nadaraja. 2012. “Vocabulary Teaching.” Seminar on Evaluation of Tamil Textbook. Madurai: Madurai Kamaraj University.

Nagy, William, Virginia W. Berninger, and Robert D. Abbott. 2006. “Contributions of Morphology Beyond Phonology to Literacy Outcomes of Upper Elementary and Middle-School Students.” Journal of Educational Psychology 98 (1): 134–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.134.