Means of representing a male assaulter and a female victim in media texts

Author

Filatova, Alina Mikhailovna

Affiliation

Samara University of Public Administration “International Market Institute”

Ulitsa Grigoriya Aksakova 21, Samara 443030, Russia

Abstract

The article deals with lexical means of representation of male assaulter and female victim images in English-language media texts covering sexual scandals. The sexual scandal stems from gender conflict, which is based on relations of power and subordination, and on the violation of social norms. A man is the subject of power, while a woman is the object of power. To create a vivid contrast between these roles, journalists use a certain set of lexical, grammatical and word-formation models, constructing two basic gender roles: “male rapist” and “female victim”. The analysis of the used lexical means and word-formation models makes it possible not only to identify the nature of the evaluation attributed to these gender roles but also to trace their development and further breaking, which suggests the implementation of a pragmatic setting of texts about sexual scandals—breaking down outdated ideas about gender roles.

Keywords

sexual scandal; mass media; category of evaluation; lexical means; word-formation models; gender roles; stereotypes

Publication Date

December 1, 2019

Issue

Volume 6, Issue 1

Citation information

Filatova, Alina Mikhailovna. 2019. “Means of representing a male assaulter and a female victim in media texts.” Language. Text. Society 6 (1): 1-12.

BibTeX

@Article{Filatova2019,
author = {Filatova, Alina Mikhailovna},
title = {Means of representing a male assaulter and a female victim in media texts},
journal = {Language. Text. Society},
year = {2019},
volume = {6},
number = {1},
pages = {1–12},
url = {https://ltsj.online/2019-06-1-filatova},
}

References

Arutiunova, Nina Davidovna. 1988. Tipy iazykovykh znachenii: Otsenka. Sobytiia. Fakt [Types of linguistic meanings: Evaluation. Events. Fact]. Moscow: Nauka. (in Russian)

Bazhenova, Elena Aleksandrovna. 2003. “Kategoriia otsenki” [Category of evaluation]. In Stilisticheskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar’ russkogo iazyka [Stylistic encyclopedic dictionary of the Russian language], edited by Margarita Nikolaevna Kozhina, 139. Moscow: Flinta. (in Russian)

Cherkas, Elena Mikhailovna. 1999. “K probleme otsenki v semanticheskoi strukture iazykovoi edinitsy” [On the problem of evaluation in the semantic structure of a language unit]. Vestnik Minskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta [Minsk State Linguistic University Bulletin], no. 5: 71–75. (in Russian)

Hunston, Susan, and Geoff Thompson. 2000. “Evaluation: An Introduction.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, edited by Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson, 1–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Il’ina, Nelli Vladimirovna. 1984. “Struktura i funktsionirovanie otsenochnykh konstruktsii v sovremennom angliiskom iazyke” [Structure and functioning of evaluation constructions in modern English]. PhD dissertation. Moscow. (in Russian)

Khoroshilova, Oksana Anatol’evna. 2010. “Otsenochnyi kontsept ‘good/khoroshii’ kak strukturnyi element angliiskoi i russkoi iazykovykh kartin mira” [Evaluation concept “good/khoroshii” as a structural element of English and Russian linguistic world views]. Vestnik Adygeiskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Adygeya State University Bulletin], no. 4: 179–183. (in Russian)

Martin, J. R., и P. R. R. White. 2005. The language of evaluation: appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Sergeeva, Larisa Aleksandrovna. 2003. Problemy otsenochnoi semantiki [Problems of evaluative semantics]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta [Moscow State Regional University]. (in Russian)

Stepanova, Alina Sergeevna, and Anna Vladimirovna Kuryanovich. 2017. “Kompleksnyi analiz iazykovykh sredstv vyrazheniia otsenki v tvorcheskom diskurse Z. Gippius v aspekte idiostilia (na materiale stat’i ‘O zhenskom pole’)” [Complex analysis of language means of expression of evaluation in creative discourse by Z. Gippius in the aspect of idiostile (on the material of the article «On the female field»)]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin], no. 10: 21–27. (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.23951/1609-624X-2017-10-21-27.

Teliia, Veronika Nikolaevna. 1986. Konnotativnyi aspekt semantiki nominativnykh edinits [Connotational aspect of the nominative units’ semantics]. Moscow: Nauka. (in Russian)

Vol’f, Elena Mikhailovna. 1985. Funktsional’naia semantika otsenki [Functional semantics of evaluation]. Moscow: Nauka. (in Russian)

Weber, Maximilian Karl Emil. 2018. Politika kak prizvanie i professiia [Politics as a Vocation]. Moscow: Ripol-Klassik. (in Russian)